Updated April 2026 Best for EU compliance

Emitlo vs Mailjet: Which Should You Choose in 2026?

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, deliverability, GDPR compliance, and developer experience — so you can pick the right transactional email provider for your stack.

Feature Emitlo Mailjet
Free tier 12,000 emails/mo 400/day cap · No credit card ~6,000 emails/mo 200/day cap · No credit card
Starting paid price $0.15 / 1,000 emails Pay-as-you-go, no commitment $17/month (15k emails) Fixed monthly plan
No email content stored in DB Cleared after send Stored in logs
GDPR compliant (native) ⚠️ Acquired by Sinch (Sweden)
EU data hosting ⚠️ Sinch infrastructure
REST API + SMTP
Double DKIM signing Domain key + platform key Single key only
Real-time deliverability dashboard ⚠️ Basic stats only
Automatic bounce & complaint handling ⚠️
FBL (Feedback Loop) processing ⚠️
Webhooks (all events) ⚠️ Limited event types
Dedicated IPs
Setup time < 10 min ~30 min
Human support (no bots) Ticket system, slow post-acquisition
Stable roadmap Acquired by Sinch 2022
Free tier
Emitlo
12,000 emails/mo

400/day cap · No credit card

Mailjet
~6,000 emails/mo

200/day cap · No credit card

Starting paid price
Emitlo
$0.15 / 1,000 emails

Pay-as-you-go, no commitment

Mailjet
$17/month (15k emails)

Fixed monthly plan

No email content stored in DB
Emitlo
✅ Yes

Cleared after send

Mailjet
❌ No

Stored in logs

GDPR compliant (native)
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial

Acquired by Sinch (Sweden)

EU data hosting
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial

Sinch infrastructure

REST API + SMTP
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
✅ Yes
Double DKIM signing
Emitlo
✅ Yes

Domain key + platform key

Mailjet
❌ No

Single key only

Real-time deliverability dashboard
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial

Basic stats only

Automatic bounce & complaint handling
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial
FBL (Feedback Loop) processing
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial
Webhooks (all events)
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
⚠️ Partial

Limited event types

Dedicated IPs
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
✅ Yes
Setup time
Emitlo
< 10 min
Mailjet
~30 min
Human support (no bots)
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
❌ No

Ticket system, slow post-acquisition

Stable roadmap
Emitlo
✅ Yes
Mailjet
❌ No

Acquired by Sinch 2022

Bottom line

Choose Emitlo if you need reliable transactional email with transparent pay-as-you-go pricing, real-time deliverability monitoring, no email content stored in database, and human support. Choose Mailjet if you need a combined marketing + transactional platform with a drag-and-drop email builder and you're already invested in their template ecosystem — and you're comfortable with the uncertainty following the Sinch acquisition.

Ready to switch from Mailjet to Emitlo?

12,000 emails/month free (400/day) · Double DKIM · No credit card required

Overview: Emitlo vs Mailjet

Mailjet was founded in France in 2010 and built a strong reputation as a combined transactional and marketing email platform. In 2022, it was acquired by Sinch, a Swedish communications company. Since the acquisition, many developers have reported slower support, UI stagnation, and uncertainty about the product's future direction.

Emitlo is a modern transactional email infrastructure built for developers, startups, and SaaS teams. It focuses exclusively on reliable delivery — not marketing campaigns — with a clean REST API, SMTP relay, real-time deliverability dashboard, and a free tier of 12,000 emails/month (up to 400/day) with no credit card required.

Pricing Comparison

Both Emitlo and Mailjet offer a free tier with no credit card required. The key differences are in volume, daily caps, and paid plan structure.

Free monthly volume
Emitlo
12,000 emails
Mailjet
~6,000 emails
Free daily cap
Emitlo
400/day
Mailjet
200/day
Credit card required
Emitlo
No
Mailjet
No
Paid plan start
Emitlo
$0.15 / 1k emails
Mailjet
$17/mo (15k emails)
50,000 emails/mo
Emitlo
$7.50
Mailjet
~$35/mo
100,000 emails/mo
Emitlo
$15
Mailjet
~$65/mo
Commitment
Emitlo
None (pay-as-you-go)
Mailjet
Monthly plan

* Mailjet prices based on public data, April 2026. Emitlo Pro at $0.15/1,000 emails.

Where Emitlo Wins

1. No email content stored in database

Emitlo's most distinctive privacy feature: the body of every email is cleared from the system immediately after it is queued for delivery. Only metadata (recipient address, delivery status, event timestamps) is retained. This is a significant advantage for teams handling sensitive data — medical notifications, financial alerts, legal communications — where storing email content creates compliance risk.

2. Double DKIM signing for maximum deliverability

Every email sent through Emitlo is signed with two DKIM keys: your own domain key and Emitlo's platform key. This double-signing approach is rare among email providers and significantly improves inbox placement with strict receivers like Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo.

3. Real-time deliverability dashboard

Emitlo provides a full deliverability dashboard with bounces, complaints, spam scores, opens, and clicks — all in real time. Mailjet's analytics are more focused on marketing campaigns and lack the depth needed for transactional email debugging.

4. Transparent pay-as-you-go pricing

Emitlo's pricing is a single rate: $0.15/1,000 emails. No tiers, no feature gates, no overage surprises. Mailjet's tiered model means you pay for a plan ceiling you may not reach, and premium features require upgrading to higher tiers.

5. Human support, not a ticket queue

Emitlo provides direct human support — no chatbots, no tickets that disappear. Post-acquisition, Mailjet's support has been widely criticized for slow response times and generic answers.

Where Mailjet Wins

1. MJML and drag-and-drop email builder

Mailjet created MJML, the responsive email framework, and offers a visual drag-and-drop email builder. If your team needs non-technical users to design email templates, Mailjet's editor is a genuine advantage. Emitlo is API-first and expects HTML input.

2. Combined marketing + transactional platform

Mailjet handles both transactional and marketing emails in one platform. If you want a single vendor for newsletters, campaigns, and transactional messages, Mailjet covers all three. Emitlo is focused exclusively on transactional delivery.

3. Established brand and integrations

Mailjet has been around since 2010 and has integrations with many CMS platforms, e-commerce tools, and marketing stacks. If you rely on a specific third-party integration, check Mailjet's integration library first.

API & Developer Experience

Both Emitlo and Mailjet offer REST API and SMTP relay. Emitlo's API is designed to be minimal and predictable: a single POST /api/v1/messages endpoint handles all sends. Authentication uses API keys. Webhooks are HMAC-signed for security.

Mailjet's API is more complex, reflecting its dual transactional/marketing nature. The Send API v3.1 is clean, but navigating the full API surface (campaigns, contacts, templates, statistics) adds cognitive overhead for developers who only need transactional delivery.

Emitlo is compatible with any stack: Node.js, Python, PHP, Ruby, Go, or any language that can make HTTP requests or connect via SMTP. The onboarding takes under 10 minutes from signup to first sent email.

Deliverability & Infrastructure

Emitlo's infrastructure is hosted in Europe with redundant architecture and automatic failover. Key deliverability features include:

  • Double DKIM signing (domain key + platform key)
  • SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configured automatically on domain setup
  • Automatic bounce processing via DSN parsing with VERP-encoded Return-Path
  • FBL (Feedback Loop) processing for complaint handling
  • Automatic suppression list management
  • Real-time spam score monitoring
  • Dedicated IPs available for high-volume senders

Data Privacy & Compliance

This is where Emitlo has a clear structural advantage. Emitlo does not store email body content in its database. The message body is held only during queue transit and cleared immediately after the email is submitted to the delivery infrastructure. Only metadata is retained: recipient address, delivery status, timestamps, and event data.

For teams sending sensitive transactional emails — password resets, medical notifications, financial statements, legal documents — this is a critical compliance consideration. Storing email content creates GDPR exposure: it becomes personal data that must be managed, protected, and deleted on request.

Mailjet, as part of Sinch (headquartered in Sweden), processes data under EU law, but its data retention policies for email content are less transparent. The acquisition also means data flows through Sinch's broader infrastructure.

Pricing at Scale

At 100,000 emails/month, Emitlo costs $15. Mailjet's equivalent plan costs approximately $65/month. At 500,000 emails/month, Emitlo costs $75 vs Mailjet's custom pricing (typically $150–$250+). The gap widens significantly at scale.

Emitlo's pay-as-you-go model also means you never pay for capacity you don't use. If your volume drops one month, your bill drops proportionally. Mailjet's tiered plans charge a fixed monthly fee regardless of actual usage.

Who Should Use Emitlo

  • Developers and engineering teams who want a clean, minimal API without marketing bloat
  • Startups and SaaS companies that need reliable transactional email from day one
  • European companies with strict GDPR requirements around email content storage
  • Teams migrating away from Mailjet due to post-acquisition uncertainty
  • Any team sending fewer than 12,000 emails/month who wants a free, production-ready solution (up to 400/day)
  • High-volume senders who want transparent, predictable pricing without tier surprises

Verdict

For pure transactional email delivery, Emitlo is the stronger choice in 2026. It offers better pricing at scale, stronger privacy guarantees (no email content stored), double DKIM signing, a real-time deliverability dashboard, and human support — all with a free tier that requires no credit card.

Mailjet remains relevant if you need a combined marketing + transactional platform with a visual email builder. But for developer teams focused on reliable transactional delivery, the post-acquisition uncertainty and higher pricing make Emitlo the more compelling option.

Switch to Emitlo in under 10 minutes

12,000 emails/month free (400/day) · Double DKIM · No credit card · Human support

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Emitlo cheaper than Mailjet?
Both offer a free tier. Emitlo's free plan gives 12,000 emails/month (400/day cap, no credit card). Mailjet's free plan gives ~6,000 emails/month (200/day cap). On paid plans, Emitlo charges $0.15/1,000 emails with no commitment. Mailjet's Essential plan starts at $17/month for 15,000 emails. At scale, Emitlo is significantly cheaper.
Does Emitlo support MJML templates like Mailjet?
Emitlo focuses on reliable email delivery via REST API and SMTP. You can use any template engine including MJML on your side before sending — Emitlo accepts standard HTML email content. Mailjet's drag-and-drop editor is a marketing tool; for transactional email, raw HTML control is preferred by developers.
Can I migrate from Mailjet to Emitlo?
Yes, migration is straightforward. Add your sending domain to Emitlo (DNS verification takes under 10 minutes), generate API credentials or SMTP settings, and update your application. Most teams complete the migration in under an hour.
Is Emitlo GDPR compliant?
Yes. Emitlo is built with GDPR compliance as a core principle: email body content is never stored in the database — it is cleared immediately after the message is queued for delivery. Only metadata (recipient, status, events) is retained. Infrastructure is hosted in Europe.
What happened to Mailjet after the Sinch acquisition?
Mailjet was acquired by Sinch (a Swedish company) in 2022. Since then, users have reported slower support response times, UI stagnation, and uncertainty about the product roadmap. For teams that need a stable, developer-focused transactional email provider, this creates a real risk.
Does Emitlo offer double DKIM signing?
Yes. Emitlo signs every outgoing email with two DKIM keys: your own domain key and Emitlo's platform key. This double-signing approach maximizes deliverability and inbox placement, especially with strict receivers like Gmail and Outlook.

Also compare: